Yes, 19 min, D-76, 1+1, EI 160, NOT 50 as I said in my last post; I must have been thinking of Forte 100.
This is the slowest film I've ever seen. My remaining rolls are now demoted to ageing new batches of Diafine.
I never got to like this film, but Forte 100 was a decent product.
Search found 80 matches
- Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:22 pm
- Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
- Topic: Fortepan 400 in D-76: will 1:1 dilution work?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6614
- Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:52 pm
- Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
- Topic: Fortepan 400 in D-76: will 1:1 dilution work?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6614
- Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:38 pm
- Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
- Topic: request for Thermometer suggestions
- Replies: 6
- Views: 10566
- Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:09 pm
- Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
- Topic: What`s In A Name?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6159
- Wed Feb 04, 2009 5:48 pm
- Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
- Topic: drying negatives
- Replies: 6
- Views: 12021
Read this thread, in particular, Photo Engineer's post. He's retired from Kodak and knows his stuff.
http://www.apug.org/forums/forum37/4491 ... flo-2.html
http://www.apug.org/forums/forum37/4491 ... flo-2.html
- Wed Feb 04, 2009 5:39 pm
- Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
- Topic: drying negatives
- Replies: 6
- Views: 12021
Kitty, DO NOT use dish detergent! What a stupid thing to recommend to someone! Dish detergents contain dyes, alcohols and who knows what other things that may be harmful to your film. Get some Kodak Photo-flo or the equivilent. You took time to create the images before you. Do you want your negs to ...
- Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:04 pm
- Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
- Topic: Your first Camera and film.
- Replies: 12
- Views: 65944
My VERY first camera was a Kodak Hawkeye Instamatic II. It took 126 film and I loaded it with b/w, probably Verichrome, and had them processed at the drug store. It was cool to get little square b/w prints back with wavy edges. Still have the camera, too. Next was a Ricoh rangefinder in HS photo cla...
- Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:02 pm
- Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
- Topic: neopan 1600 @ 3200 dev time
- Replies: 22
- Views: 29815
- Thu Jan 01, 2009 6:58 pm
- Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
- Topic: Book recommendations?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 12434
Not books, but hepful websites:
http://www.unblinkingeye.com/ go to articles
http://www.rogerandfrances.com/ the photo school may be helpful
http://www.unblinkingeye.com/ go to articles
http://www.rogerandfrances.com/ the photo school may be helpful
- Thu Dec 25, 2008 7:43 pm
- Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
- Topic: Christmas.
- Replies: 1
- Views: 5181
- Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:05 am
- Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
- Topic: the best developer
- Replies: 12
- Views: 33680
- Sat Oct 18, 2008 2:07 pm
- Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
- Topic: FX2 developer
- Replies: 11
- Views: 22142
- Mon Sep 29, 2008 4:53 pm
- Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
- Topic: neopan 1600-true speed
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7853
Reminds me of when Kodak VR1000 color neg film came out. I was working in a pro lab that also did amateur work. The first roll we got in was shot outside on a cloudless, bright, sunny day in Feb. with lots of snow. Go figure. I haven't used this film, but like you, I've read where is about 800 speed...
- Sat Aug 16, 2008 6:23 am
- Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
- Topic: Old Glycin
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6091
I wouldn't bother. It won't give the results you'd get from fresh glycin. It can give a bit of a warm look on paper, but your contrast will be lower and your print ends up looking like you snatched it out of the dev too quickly. There just isn't the strength left in it to do the job. It's a shame as...
- Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:49 pm
- Forum: The Digitaltruth Forum
- Topic: Fuji Neopan 400: In the same league as Tri-X or HP5?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 13805
Yes, it's good stuff. I shoot quite a bit of it and I've never had a QC problem with it, but neither have I had a problem with Kodak or Ilford. When you buy one of these three films it's like buying chocolate ice cream. You've got Breyers, you've got Ben & Jerry's. Both are great, both might be a li...