Tetenal Neopress HC Developer

Film Photography & Darkroom discussion

Moderator: Keith Tapscott.

Post Reply
richam
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 6:30 am
Location: Preveza, Greece
Contact:

Tetenal Neopress HC Developer

Post by richam » Thu Feb 22, 2007 6:34 am

Is this the equivalent of any listed developer? If not, should I upload data per the sheet that came with it?
Mike Richards


Keith Tapscott.
Posts: 531
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:58 am
Location: Plymouth, England.

Re: Tetenal Neopress HC Developer

Post by Keith Tapscott. » Thu Feb 22, 2007 1:19 pm

richam wrote:Is this the equivalent of any listed developer? If not, should I upload data per the sheet that came with it?
It`s the Tetenal equivalent of Kodak HC110 and Ilford Ilfotec HC.

pentaxpete
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 7:19 am
Location: BRENTWOOD,Essex,(UK)

Post by pentaxpete » Tue Mar 06, 2007 10:16 am

I was given a litre of this developer but NO instruction sheet. Can I use the times and dilutions in the Massive Dev Chart for HC110 ? Or is there somewhere I can see it on a site?
Got COMPUTERISED and 'slightly Digitised Pentax K10D' but FILM STILL RULES !

richam
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 6:30 am
Location: Preveza, Greece
Contact:

Post by richam » Tue Mar 06, 2007 12:30 pm

pentaxpete,
I uploaded the information I got with the developer, but only some of the entries showed up on the chart. If you provide me your email, I'll send you scans of the pertinent parts of the brochure that came with the developer. richam AT mac DOT com
Mike Richards

Digitaltruth
Site Admin
Posts: 287
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 8:24 pm
Contact:

Post by Digitaltruth » Tue Mar 06, 2007 10:54 pm

Richam,

The second batch of times you submitted for Neopress HC will be added to the chart at the next update, probably in a couple weeks time. All updates are done on a periodic basis after enough new data is accumulated. Users cannot automatically update the chart as this would lead to a loss of integrity of data, so the reason only some of the times you sent in were added is that we performed an update after your first submission, but the second submission arrived after the update.
Digitaltruth Photo
https://www.digitaltruth.com

richam
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 6:30 am
Location: Preveza, Greece
Contact:

Post by richam » Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:41 am

Jon,
I expected as such. Did not mean to criticize. Appreciate your interest and reply.
Mike Richards

pentaxpete
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 7:19 am
Location: BRENTWOOD,Essex,(UK)

Post by pentaxpete » Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:35 am

richam: I tried to send you a 'Private Message ' with my e-mail but it came up that 'Private Messages have been disabled in this board'
Got COMPUTERISED and 'slightly Digitised Pentax K10D' but FILM STILL RULES !

Keith Tapscott.
Posts: 531
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:58 am
Location: Plymouth, England.

Post by Keith Tapscott. » Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:48 am

pentaxpete wrote:richam: I tried to send you a 'Private Message ' with my e-mail but it came up that 'Private Messages have been disabled in this board'
Contact Jon Mided.

Digitaltruth
Site Admin
Posts: 287
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 8:24 pm
Contact:

Post by Digitaltruth » Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:02 am

Private messaging has now been enabled. From time to time we need to disable it for security reasons and it appears that it was left disabled during the last maintenance check.
Digitaltruth Photo
https://www.digitaltruth.com

Post Reply