New Fuji Acros II Film.

Film Photography & Darkroom discussion

Moderator: Keith Tapscott.

Post Reply
Keith Tapscott.
Posts: 530
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:58 am
Location: Plymouth, England.

New Fuji Acros II Film.

Post by Keith Tapscott. » Fri Jun 14, 2019 9:44 am



Ornello
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:49 am

Re: New Fuji Acros II Film.

Post by Ornello » Wed Jun 26, 2019 10:31 pm

I'm hoping for a 400-speed Neopan resurrection....

pirateoversixty
Posts: 219
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 1:21 pm
Location: Peoria, Illinois

Re: New Fuji Acros II Film.

Post by pirateoversixty » Sat Jul 13, 2019 12:27 pm

Didn't use a lot of it, but never could get a handle on it. Did use a lot of Neopan 400. Would certainly welcome its return rather than Acros.

Jim

Ornello
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:49 am

Re: New Fuji Acros II Film.

Post by Ornello » Sat Jul 20, 2019 10:43 pm

pirateoversixty wrote:
Sat Jul 13, 2019 12:27 pm
Didn't use a lot of it, but never could get a handle on it. Did use a lot of Neopan 400. Would certainly welcome its return rather than Acros.

Jim
Yep, me too!

pirateoversixty
Posts: 219
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 1:21 pm
Location: Peoria, Illinois

Re: New Fuji Acros II Film.

Post by pirateoversixty » Sun Jul 21, 2019 3:47 pm

Granted, Acros did have some favorable characteristics going for it, probably the one most appreciated was its reciprocity, favored by low-lite shooters. Also, fine grain. Many 400-speed films today, including Neopan 400, if handled correctly, could almost equal Acros in apparent grain. There are quite a few 400 films available today, some good, some very good, and I doubt if there is much room left for another one.
Jim

Ornello
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:49 am

Re: New Fuji Acros II Film.

Post by Ornello » Fri Jul 26, 2019 9:49 pm

pirateoversixty wrote:
Sun Jul 21, 2019 3:47 pm
Granted, Acros did have some favorable characteristics going for it, probably the one most appreciated was its reciprocity, favored by low-lite shooters. Also, fine grain. Many 400-speed films today, including Neopan 400, if handled correctly, could almost equal Acros in apparent grain. There are quite a few 400 films available today, some good, some very good, and I doubt if there is much room left for another one.
Jim

Yeah, but the tones are fantastic!

Keith Tapscott.
Posts: 530
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:58 am
Location: Plymouth, England.

Re: New Fuji Acros II Film.

Post by Keith Tapscott. » Tue Jul 30, 2019 8:24 am

Perhaps Fuji will reintroduce Neopan 400 if there is enough interest. Kodak recently began producing T-MAX 3200 again.

pirateoversixty
Posts: 219
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 1:21 pm
Location: Peoria, Illinois

Re: New Fuji Acros II Film.

Post by pirateoversixty » Sun Aug 04, 2019 10:11 am

Don't really understand why 3200 was brought back. By my estimation, that is really really a niche film. Have not read very much about the new incarnation, but would hope that it is significantly changed from the old. Anyway, I doubt that I will ever get to try as my photography has drastically tapered off in the last seven years, and I have turned into a care-giver for my wife who is battling cancer. I would like to get my Rollei 2.8f cla'd, but I couldn't justify the expense, considering how little I would use it.

It is encouraging that some manufacturers are (re)introducing product back into the mix. Hope springs eternal for some of us who have kept the faith.
Jim

Ornello
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:49 am

Re: New Fuji Acros II Film.

Post by Ornello » Tue Aug 06, 2019 4:20 pm

pirateoversixty wrote:
Sun Aug 04, 2019 10:11 am
Don't really understand why 3200 was brought back. By my estimation, that is really really a niche film. Have not read very much about the new incarnation, but would hope that it is significantly changed from the old. Anyway, I doubt that I will ever get to try as my photography has drastically tapered off in the last seven years, and I have turned into a care-giver for my wife who is battling cancer. I would like to get my Rollei 2.8f cla'd, but I couldn't justify the expense, considering how little I would use it.

It is encouraging that some manufacturers are (re)introducing product back into the mix. Hope springs eternal for some of us who have kept the faith.
Jim
I have shot some of it; it's quite good, true speed is about ISO 800. It's finer-grained and sharper than Ilford's Delta.

pirateoversixty
Posts: 219
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 1:21 pm
Location: Peoria, Illinois

Re: New Fuji Acros II Film.

Post by pirateoversixty » Fri Aug 09, 2019 8:43 pm

Never tested Neopan 400 for true speed, but exposed at 400, both 35 and 120, it always met my needs. If exposed at true 800, wouldn't a Neopan, UFX 400, Pancro 400, or HP5+ give a finer grain, if appropriately processed? I know the "pushed film drill," but an approximate one stop under isn't that much, unless you are hypercritical.
jim

Ornello
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:49 am

Re: New Fuji Acros II Film.

Post by Ornello » Wed Aug 21, 2019 10:16 pm

pirateoversixty wrote:
Fri Aug 09, 2019 8:43 pm
Never tested Neopan 400 for true speed, but exposed at 400, both 35 and 120, it always met my needs. If exposed at true 800, wouldn't a Neopan, UFX 400, Pancro 400, or HP5+ give a finer grain, if appropriately processed? I know the "pushed film drill," but an approximate one stop under isn't that much, unless you are hypercritical.
jim
I don't understand your question.

pirateoversixty
Posts: 219
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 1:21 pm
Location: Peoria, Illinois

Re: New Fuji Acros II Film.

Post by pirateoversixty » Sun Sep 01, 2019 11:11 am

wouldn't a 400 speed film underexposed by one stop give finer grain than 3200 exposed at 800?

Ornello
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:49 am

Re: New Fuji Acros II Film.

Post by Ornello » Mon Sep 02, 2019 8:33 pm

pirateoversixty wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2019 11:11 am
wouldn't a 400 speed film underexposed by one stop give finer grain than 3200 exposed at 800?
No, but but grain is not the only issue. Underexposure looks like crap.

Post Reply